Feature
Overwise
Apollo
Lead-discovery method
Web scraping (Google Maps + IG + sites) + Apollo + signals
Static contact database (LinkedIn-anchored)
Coverage of non-LinkedIn segments
Yes (padel courts, coworking, event organizers, local biz)
No or thin
Absence-signal probes (e.g. 'no booking widget')
Yes, configurable per project
No
Drafts copy in your voice
Yes (sent-folder extraction)
Templated AI rewrite
Multi-channel routing per lead
Email + LinkedIn + IG + WhatsApp + phone
Email + LinkedIn (Sequences)
MessageVerifier (cite-or-discard)
Yes
No
Reply triage with classification
Yes (positive / question / negative / OOO)
Reply detection only
Pricing model
Per-project subscription, unlimited team
Per-seat tiers
Built for
B2B SaaS founders doing their own outbound
SDR teams
Starting price
From $99/mo all-inclusive · unlimited team
$59/seat/mo Basic · $99/seat/mo Professional
Honest section

When Apollo is the better choice.

  • Your ICP is on LinkedIn. If you sell to founders, CTOs, VPs at known-on-LinkedIn companies — Apollo's 200M+ contact database is the right starting point. Overwise's web-scraping adds little here.
  • Lead-discovery is your only need. If you have sending and drafting solved (Lemlist + a copywriter), Apollo is the cheapest route to verified contacts at scale.
  • You have a 5+ person SDR team. Apollo's per-seat economics, role-based access, and CRM integrations are built for team workflows. Overwise is built for founder-volume.
  • You need 100,000+ contacts/month. Apollo's credit-based model scales to enormous volumes. Overwise's lead caps top out at 5,000/month on Founder Team.

Quick answers, before you decide.

Is Apollo's database better than Overwise's lead discovery?

For known-on-LinkedIn segments (founders, CTOs, VPs at funded companies) — Apollo has 200M+ contacts and that's hard to beat. For non-LinkedIn segments (padel courts, coworking spaces, family-run service businesses) — Apollo's coverage drops to near-zero. Overwise scrapes the open web with absence-signal probes and surfaces leads Apollo can't.

Can Apollo's Sequences replace Overwise?

Apollo Sequences is a basic email cadence tool — it sends, but it doesn't draft in your voice, cite signals, classify replies, or route per-channel. If your buyer is on Apollo and you have a copywriter, Sequences is fine. If you're a solo founder doing outbound at night, Overwise's agentic loop is meaningfully different.

What about Apollo's verified email rate?

Apollo verifies ~80% of contacts; Overwise verifies emails before surfacing them (98% deliverability across our internal sends). The bigger gap isn't verification — it's coverage in the segments Apollo doesn't index.

Is Apollo cheaper for small teams?

Apollo's Basic is $59/seat/mo. For a 1-person team that's $59/mo vs Overwise's $99/mo. But Apollo doesn't include sending, drafting, reply triage, or multi-channel — you'd add Lemlist or Instantly ($37+/mo) and a copywriter. Bundled cost-per-job, Overwise is cheaper at the founder-volume tier.

Live in five minutes

Your first leads, in 5 minutes.

★★★★★ 4.9 · 620+ reviews

"Set it up in five minutes, no demo gate. First verified list before my coffee was cold — and it sounds exactly like me."

P
Priya NadarHead of GTM, Foldable
Card on file · No demo gate · Cancel any time
Start 14-day trial — first leads in 5 min →